SKKN The use and the efectiveness of using reading in teaching writing at Vinh Cuu high school
heoretical background
Eisterhold (1990, as cited in AlOmrani, 2014) interpreted the connection
between reading and writing by using three hypotheses, which are “directional
hypothesis, non-directional hypothesis, and bidirectional hypothesis” (Eisterhold,
1990, as cited in AlOmrani, 2014, p. 102). Directional hypothesis claimed that
information/knowledge obtained from reading materials will be used in writing,
which means that the use of reading is supporting writing (AlOmrani, 2014).
Meanwhile, non-directional hypothesis means that information/knowledge learned
from writing can be used in reading and vice versa, which means reading is used to
assist writing and vice versa (AlOmrani, 2014). Bidirectional hypothesis stated that
“reading and writing are both interactive and interdependent” (AlOmrani, 2014, p.
103). This means that the change in students’ language proficiency may lead to the
change in their writing abilities or reading abilities, which can be understood that if
their writing abilities develop, their reading abilities will develop and vice versa
(AlOmrani, 2014).
Although the relationship between receptive skills and productive skills did
not state that students need to become good readers to be good writers, it did
interpret the reason for integrating reading skills and writing skills in teaching.
Meanwhile, the hypotheses of Eisterhold (1990, as cited in AlOmrani, 2014)
explained specifically the positive impact of reading and writing on each other.
The researcher claimed that the proficiency in students’ writing skills have the
influence on the proficiency in students’ reading skills and vice versa. However,
the connection between reading and writing in this technique can be interpreted by
directional hypothesis, because this technique was made to teach writing skills
with reading as the main support of writing (AlOmrani, 2014).
The hypotheses of Eisterhold (1990, as cited in AlOmrani, 2014) explained
specifically the positive impact of reading and writing on each other. The
researchers claimed that the proficiency in students’ writing skills have the
influence on the proficiency in students’ reading skills and vice versa. However,
the connection between reading and writing in this technique can be interpreted by
directional hypothesis, because this technique was made to teach writing skills
with reading as the main support of writing (AlOmrani, 2014). The use of reading
is suggested as an effective technique to improve EFL students’ writing skills
(AlOmrani, 2014; Grabe & Zhang, 2013 & Habibi et al., 2015). Hence, in order to
be aware of the feasibility and effectiveness of the use of reading in teaching
writing, many researchers and teachers started to do more research on applying this
technique in teaching writing as well as apply it in their classes.
to examine the use and the effectiveness of integrating English writing skills and English reading skills Vietnamese classrooms, the writing is designed to answer 2 following questions: 1. Do English teachers in Vietnam use reading to improve students’ writing skills? 2. Does the use of reading in teaching writing improve Vietnamese students’ English writing skills? 4 Methodology Participants: The surveys were carried out at the two classes the writer has taught: 11A2, 11A10 with eighty participants who are in the second term of the school and 23 other teachers were chosen randomly to take part in this research. The participants are graduate students who are learning the first stage of Master of TESOL course at Ho Chi Minh City Open University. There are 5 teachers who are teaching at English language centers, while there are 13 teachers from state schools in Ho Chi Minh city. Another 5 teachers are teaching at private schools. In addition, around 30% of them have over 5 years teaching experience. Data collection Teachers were given questionnaires to elicit information on the respondents. Two questionnaires were designed to collect teachers’ opinions in order to answer two research questions. The first questionnaire includes 7 questions. The first and second questions are used to ask teachers’ teaching experience and institution. The next 5 questions are used to find out teachers’ acknowledgment of this technique and the use of it in their classes. Meanwhile, the second questionnaire has 6 questions, which is used to elicit the effectiveness of this technique by asking teachers who applied it. Findings and discussion Research question 1: Do English teachers in Vietnam use reading to improve students’ writing skills? The data of chart 1 was collected from the questionnaire 1. According to the chart, there were 5 teachers who confirmed that they did not know this technique, because of their old universities, TESOL training courses or the current Master of TESOL did not teach them. Hence, they could not apply this technique in their classes. 5 On the other hand, regarding the chart 2, the rest of 23 teachers (18 teachers) know this technique. Most of them (11 teachers) confirmed that their old universities, TESOL training courses and Master of TESOL taught them this technique. Meanwhile, 5 of them know this technique through reading books or journal articles of teaching writing. This means that they have interest in teaching writing. The rest of them (2 teachers) know this technique because their colleagues introduced it to them. However, there were 5 teachers did not use this technique to teach writing, even though they know it. The reasons for this are shown in the chart 3. To conclude, there were 23 teachers, who were asked about integrating reading skills with writing skills. However, just 18 teachers know this technique. Although there were 18 teachers who know this technique, just 13 teachers (around 57%) applied the use of reading in teaching writing in order to improve their students’ writing skills. Therefore, it can be stated that there were a positive number of teachers paid attention to the use of reading in teaching writing and applied this technique in their classes. 6 Research question 2: Does the use of reading in teaching writing improve Vietnamese students’ English writing skills? In order to answer this question, 13 teachers, who used this technique, were asked to answer questionnaire 2 in order to elicit their evaluation of this technique. Considering answers collected, 5 teachers stated that their students’ writing skills were improved after using reading to support and enhance students’ writing abilities. The chart 4 below displays these 5 teachers’ evaluation of advantages that this technique brought to their students. Regarding the chart 4, after applying this technique in their classes, all 5 teachers believed that their students’ accuracy of using grammar and punctuation was developed as well as their ability of arranging logically their writing’s ideas. In addition, 4 of them confirmed the development in their students’ writing content as well as the improvement in writing’s coherence and cohesion of their students. Meanwhile, they realized that their students could not use complex grammar structures fluently even after using this technique. Considering these figures, it can be claimed that the use of reading did have a positive impact on students’ writing skills, especially improving the use of grammar and punctuation and the organization of writing’s ideas. This is a basis of the development in writing’s content and writing’s coherence and cohesion. However, considering the fact that students were not able to use complex grammatical structures, teachers need to pay more attention to students’ grammar. The rest of them (8 teachers) claimed that this technique is ineffective, because they had to cope with some obstacles. 7 According to the chart 5, 6 teachers claimed that their students lacked reading comprehension skill, while there are 5 teachers stated that the difficulty is students did not know how to use information/knowledge obtained from assigned reading materials in their writing. In addition, a half of them (4 teachers) pointed out that the fact that students did not read assigned reading materials was also an obstacle. Considering these figures, it can be stated that the lack of reading comprehension skill was the main problem, which meant students might have limited understanding of assigned reading materials; therefore, they could not obtain any information or knowledge to support their writing. Moreover, the lack of reading assigned reading materials could be the result of the lack of reading comprehension skills as well as the difficulty level of assigned reading materials and students’ attitudes and low-motivation. Therefore, teachers need to improve their students reading comprehension skill as well as choose reading materials that can interest students and are not beyond their English level. 2. Advantages and disadvantages a) Advantages The use of reading is supporting writing (AlOmrani, 2014). Meanwhile, non- directional hypothesis means that information/knowledge learned from writing can be used in reading and vice versa, which means reading is used to assist writing and vice versa (AlOmrani, 2014). Bidirectional hypothesis stated that “reading and writing are both interactive and interdependent” (AlOmrani, 2014, p. 103). This also means that the change in students’ language proficiency may lead the change in their writing abilities or reading abilities, which can be understood that if their writing abilities develop, their reading abilities will develop and vice versa (AlOmrani, 2014). It can be stated that the use of reading does have the positive effect on teaching writing. Most of students’ writing skills were improved. Their students were able to express their thoughts in English fluently, differentiate between the 8 topic sentence and the thesis sentence or had the improvement in organizing writing’s ideas. b) Disadvantages The first limitation of this writing is that the limited number of teachers who took part in the survey. The second limitation is that the lack of students’ opinions of the effectiveness of the use of reading in teaching writing. The use of reading had some obstacles, which led to the ineffectiveness of this technique. They were the lack of reading comprehension skill, students did not read assigned reading materials, and students did not know how to use information/knowledge obtained from assigned reading materials in their writing. If the teacher pays more attention to improve students reading comprehension skill, these obstacles can be overcome. This will lead to the effectiveness of this technique. 3. Evaluation a) New points The rearcher has also found out some considerations for teachers when using reading to improve EFL students’ writing skills. AlOmrani (2014) stated that because the reading materials are used “as a source for improving writing abilities” (p. 102); therefore, the reading materials must relate with the writing assignments. In addition, it is claimed that EFL teachers also need to focus on improving students’ reading skills (AlOmrani, 2014), because “if a learner has low level of proficiency in reading skills this will lead to low level of competence, performance and proficiency in writing skills as well” (Bhatt & Lilian, 2016, p. 635). However, enhancing students’ writing skills is necessary, teachers should not pay more attention to developing students’ reading skills than students’ writing skills (Morrow, 1997, as cited in AlOmrani, 2014, p. 106), because the aim of integrating reading into writing instruction is using reading materials as resources to improve and assist students with their writing skills (AlOmrani, 2014). b) Effects As mentioned above, the use of reading is suggested as an effective technique to improve EFL students’ writing skills (AlOmrani, 2014; Grabe & Zhang, 2013 & Habibi et al., 2015). Hence, in order to be aware of the feasibility and effectiveness of the use of reading in teaching writing, the researcher began to do more research on applying this technique in teaching writing as well as apply it in her classes. The result shows that almost all students make great progress in writing skill and they feel more confident in writing period, which is obviously shown in chart 6 Chart 6: Students’ view about the benefits of using reading in learning writing 9 As shown chart 6 - students’ views about the advantages they have experienced during the writing lessons in the classroom. The surveys were carried out at the two classes the writer has taught: 11A2, 11A10 at Vinhcuu high school with eighty participants taking part in the survey. In response to the first benefit whether group work motivates students to write or not, 65 students agreed that writing in groups motivates them to write, 9 students were not sure and 6 students disagreed. Regarding to the second benefit, 58 students agree that using reading in learning writing helps them use more complex sentences instead of simple sentences, while 15 students were not sure and 7 students disagreed. In students response to the third point whether this technique makes a contribution to improving students’ organizing ideas, 49 students agreed, 22 students were not sure and 9 students disagreed. For the final view point, which looked at whether taking advantage of reading in teaching writing results in good pieces of writing, 66 students agreed, only 8 students were not sure about this statement and 6 students express their disagreement. The result of the study obviously reveals that more and more students will be highly motivated and have chances to participate in writing activities if teachers .After analysis and discussion of the findings, the researcher can conclude that students considered writing as one of the most difficult skills and the large number of them supports the use of reading skill in learning and teaching writing periods. Dahan (2010) worried about the lack of essential skills for writing of her students, who were EFL learners at the American University of Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates, owned TOEFL 530 even higher. Therefore, she designed an activity, which was the Reading Project, to help her students have more interests in reading so as to improve their writing skills. According to her, students were enabled to freely choose any books that they wanted. Every week, students were 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Being confident to write Being able to use complex grammatical structures Organizing ideas for writing logically Result in good pieces of writing agree Not sure disagree 10 required to post something about their books on Discussion Board or iLearn, then they were asked to share their opinions and feelings about what they posted. It was expected that students could receive feedback and responses from their peers. During the last two weeks of classes, students were requested to give informal presentation of their books. After the presentation, they are required to a write summary of the books chosen. After using this project, she admired the improvement in her students’ writing abilities as well as their ability of expressing fluently their opinions through writing. She also confirmed that her students raised the awareness of the importance of improving background knowledge. Meanwhile, Rass designed for first year Arab EFL students at Beit Nerl College a course which integrated reading skills with writing skills in order to improve her students’ writing skills. In this course, learners were required to read anthological literature of English. Then, students were asked to write their reflection on these assigned reading materials within 5 minutes at the beginning of each class. After that, these writings would be shared with their classmates in order to have discussions about the contents and students’ opinions of the assigned reading materials. Their discussion could be considered as the basis of answering reading logs and worksheets which were used to asked about reading’ difficulties of students, the contents and students’ opinions of the reading materials. Moreover, they were requested to do weekly assignments that were writing may types of paragraphs, which was a basis of developing and writing essays. Meanwhile, their monthly assignments were informal journals about their own experiences. Students were allowed to write multiple drafts to surmount their writing’s difficulties. Each draft would receive feedback from teachers. The first and second drafts would be given comments about the content and organizing ideas, whereas comments about grammar and punctuation would be given on the final draft. Students were also required to analyse errors that were made in their peers’ writings. Comparing between students’ first writing assigment and final writign assignments, Rass indicated that her students’ proficiency in writing skills was improved. They were able to compose good essays as well as differentiate between the topic sentence, the supporting sentence and the thesis sentence. Luu (2012) conducted a study of benefits brought to EFL learners by integrating reading skills and writing skills at Ho Chi Minh City University of Finance-Marketing. The participants are 58 students who were selected randomly, then divided into 2 groups, that are control group and experimental group. Moreover, 8 experienced teachers also were chosen to take part in this study. Two groups of students would receive the same knowledge of all types of academic essays. During the first 2 weeks, they were taught by the same teaching instructions. However, from the third weeks, students of the experimental group would be taught by read-like-a-writer approach of Steve Peha, while teachers of the control group maintained the old teaching instructions. In the second week of the course, students had to do the pretest, and after 9 weeks of learning, they had to do the posttest. These tests would be evaluated by teachers based on 5 criteria: 11 organization, ideas, word choice, sentence fluency and convention by using computers. The results from these tests would be kept and used as data for this study. Moreover, students actively learn English writing style, choosing proper words and basing on the reading materials the teacher provides them. Learners remember and broaden their knowledge naturally, not mechanically as teachers teach them. For teachers, they do not need to teach students in details, but just guide students to take advatage of reading materials effectively in writing and celebrate writing activities for all students to join in. c) Application and results After applying the method, the results were completely different. Before asking students to write, the teacher provided students with reading materials about the topic and gave some questions involved in that reading passages. At the same time, the teacher based on those reading passages to teach vocabulary and structures. Students had certain knowledge of the topic. They, therefore, wrote much better. The surveys also were also carried out at Open University where the writer has taken part in M.A course. The instruments are used to do the research are questionnaire and interview. The writer then gathers information about classroom activities. The findings are more reliable with different methods. A questionnaire was designed to collect data from 23 teachers teaching different classes such as public and private schools, which is obviously presented in chart 4 and 5. The result shows that some teachers know the effective of using reading to teach writing while others do not. The findings have also revealed that the experimental group’s students have improved their writing’ essays as well as word choice. The results also pointed out that most students of the experimental group improved their sentence fluency; therefore, their writing performances were better than writing performances of the control group’ students. Considering the class of Dahan (2010), the class of Rass and the study of Luu (2012), it can be stated that the use of reading does have the positive effect on teaching writing. Most of their students’ writing skills were improved. Their students were able to express their thoughts in English fluently, differentiate between the topic sentence and the thesis sentence or had the improvement in organizing writing’s ideas. APPENDICES APPENDIX 1: Questionnaire 1: Questionnaire 2: REFERENCES AlOmrani, A. H. (2014). Integrating Reading into Writing Instruction in the EFL Programs at Saudi Universities. Arab World English Journal, 5(3), 100-112. Ariyanti. (2016). Shaping Students’ Writing Skills: The Study of Fundamental Aspects in Mastering Academic Writing. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 1(1), 63-77. Retrieved from www. indonesian-efl- journal.org Bhatt, D., & Lilian, L. (2016). An Analysis of Receptive and Productive Skills of English Language with Special Reference to Indigenous People in Odisha. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Translation Studies, 3(3), 633-639. Dahan, L. S. (2010). Where Have all the Readers Gone? Improving Writing through Reading for EFL Learners in the Arabian Gulf. Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(1), 188-194. Retrieved from https://ir.uiowa.edu/ijcs Golkova, D., & Hubackova, S. (2014). Productive Skills in Second Language Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 477-481. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.520 Habibi, H., Salleh, A. H., & Singh , M. K. (2015). The Effect of Reading on Improving the Writing of EFL Students. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 23(4), 1115 – 1138. Luu, T. T. (2012). Teaching Writing through Reading Integration. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3), 489-499. doi:10.4304/jltr.3.3.489- 499 Masduqi, H. (2016). Integrating Receptive Skills and Productive Skills into a Reading Lesson. Proceeding The 2nd International Conference On Teacher Training and Education Sebelas Maret University, 2(1), 507-511. Rass, R. A. (n.d.). Integrating Reading and Writing for Effective Language Teaching. Retrieved 1 16, 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265574333_Integrating_Reading_and _Writing_for_Effective_Language_Teaching
File đính kèm:
- skkn_the_use_and_the_efectiveness_of_using_reading_in_teachi.pdf